Landmark Ruling: Yaoundé Court Annuls Atanga Nji's Ministerial Church Intervention

The court deemed the minister's intervention an unjustified overreach, restoring the leadership rights of Pastor Tchana Landry, who was legally elected according to the church's original statutes.

The decision, delivered on November 29, 2024, "in the name of the Cameroonian people," marks a pivotal moment in this contentious case, enabling the church to restore its unity and focus on its mission.

Background of the Crisis

The leadership conflict dates back to 2021 following the death of VEDC founder Nesto Toukeu. Pastor Tchana Landry was elected as his successor in line with the church's constitution. However, the situation took a dramatic turn when Pastor Abate François, tasked with drafting the election minutes, allegedly falsified the document, replacing Tchana's name with his own.

This act of forgery led to a power struggle, with Abate claiming the leadership of the church. He went on to organize a second electoral assembly in Ayos, despite its prohibition by local authorities.

In a controversial move, Minister Paul Atanga Nji intervened by officially recognizing Abate as the legitimate leader of the church through a letter issued in February 2024. This decision sparked outrage among church members loyal to Tchana, who accused the government of undermining their internal governance.

Legal Action and Victory for Pastor Tchana

After exhausting all diplomatic options, Pastor Tchana Landry filed a lawsuit against the Ministry of Territorial Administration in March 2024. The court proceedings were drawn out over several months, but the ruling ultimately favored Tchana.

Administrative Judge Aissatou Abdoulaye Oumarou, presiding over the case, declared:

“The request for a stay of execution filed by Mr. Tchana Tchamy Dantse Landry and others is well-founded. Consequently, the effects of letter no. 00000609/L/MINAT/SG/DAP/SDP/SC of February 28, 2024, are suspended.”

The ruling effectively nullified Atanga Nji's attempt to impose leadership, reaffirming Pastor Tchana Landry as the legitimate head of the VEDC.

Reactions from the Faithful

The court's decision was met with widespread relief and jubilation among church members. Many saw it as a triumph of truth and justice over manipulation. One church member remarked:

“The law always prevails, because truth never dies; it is the liars who fade away.”

A Strong Symbol of Judicial Independence

Observers have described the ruling as more than just a routine administrative judgment. For many, it is a bold rebuke of government interference in religious affairs and a reaffirmation of the judiciary’s independence.

The case also underscores broader concerns about the politicization of religious institutions in Cameroon, with some accusing officials of using their authority to manipulate church leadership for political gain.

Implications for Governance and Religious Freedom

This decision raises significant questions about the boundaries of government authority in internal religious matters. Critics argue that Atanga Nji’s actions reflect a pattern of overreach by the administration, often undermining the autonomy of organizations and institutions.

For the VEDC, the ruling represents an opportunity to move forward under legitimate leadership. For the government, it serves as a cautionary tale about the limits of its influence in matters of faith and governance.

The Road Ahead

As the dust settles, Pastor Tchana Landry faces the challenge of reunifying a fractured congregation and rebuilding trust within the church. The ruling, while decisive, is only the beginning of a healing process for the VEDC.

For Cameroon’s government, the case is a stark reminder of the need for respect toward the autonomy of civil and religious institutions. As one observer aptly put it, “This is not just about a church; it is about the rule of law and the future of governance in Cameroon.”