Célestin Djamen Raises Concerns Over Ngannou's Defeat: Was the Fight Sold or Was Ngannou Drugged?

Djamen explores two hypotheses to explain the rapid outcome of the fight: that the match was sold or that Ngannou was drugged. Despite acknowledging Ngannou's integrity and patriotism, Djamen leans towards the latter hypothesis and provides five arguments to support his stance:

1. Joshua's punches did not display exceptional power, questioning why Ngannou, who has endured powerful blows before, succumbed so easily.

2. Ngannou's previous victory against Tyson Fury showcased his capabilities, making it unlikely for him to be easily defeated by Joshua.

3. Ngannou's need for oxygen in the corner after the first round suggests unusual fatigue or distress.

4. Joshua's lack of remarkable aggression or quality in the fight, combined with Ngannou's unusual passivity, raises suspicion.

5. Ngannou's lack of defensive guard and resistance, as well as his apparent resignation during the fight, seem out of character.

Djamen urges viewers to watch the fight closely, suggesting that Ngannou appeared dazed and uncharacteristically passive. He calls for scrutiny of the match and emphasizes the importance of adhering to anti-doping regulations in boxing. Djamen concludes by advising Ngannou to be cautious about his surroundings and consumption, referencing historical incidents where athletes faced similar suspicions and cautionary tales.